Snow's Management Inc

They are horrible! Worst in Alaska. They dont fix anything,they dont clean anything. The only thing they do effectively is collect HOA fee's and ignore problems. Tour their properties and you will see for your self.
Mar 27th, 2024

Nice and friendly staff, always willing to help!
Mar 20th, 2024

I sued Cordova Square HOA. Pam Snow is the property manager and Shane Osowski is the lawyer representing them. The HOA ended up paying me about $18,000 and they spent over $59,000 in legal fees. Heres what the Judge said: The ongoing breach allowed 47 unit owners to receive new windows between 2013-2019 at a small fraction of the actual cost; illegally paid for with HOA dues collected from all 141 unit owners. [T]he HOA argues that it informed the unit owners that the project had been canceled at the November 12, 2019 Homeowners Annual Meeting. The Court disagrees. The Court finds that the meeting minutes indicate that the Board was going to address the project at a later time. Further, the minutes from the Board of Directors Meeting held later that evening make no mention of the project being discussed. More significantly, the December 30, 2019 Board memo to the unit owners regarding the special assessment, indicated that the window project was ongoing, and that it would be paid out of regular HOA dues. Specifically, it stated: "The Special Assessment is the lowest amount we could come up with that pays for the most pressing expenses while still requiring very careful budgeting for "normal" revenue from dues to fund daily operations and maintenance plus other big ongoing projects like window replacement." [Pam] Snow testified that the Board intentionally put this language in the note, despite informing the owners otherwise at the annual meeting. She acknowledged that after reading the note, an owner would be safe to assume that the window project was ongoing. She went on to say that it would be unfair for a unit owner to be told by the Board that they were going to get their windows replaced, if the project had been cancelled. The Court finds that even if the Board intended to cancel the project, the opposite was communicated Thus, their statements were made either to mislead him, or were simply lies; either of which constituted a breach of their statutory obligations to the association and fiduciary duty. The Court finds that the totality of the evidence shows that the Board breached its ongoing contractual obligations by initiating and implementing the window replacement project; allowing the installations to be paid for with HOA dues until 2019; holding out to the unit owners that the project would continue, and be paid for with HOA dues; and collecting those dues for another three years before telling the unit owners that the project was illegal, despite receiving legal advice in 2019 that it was illegal. In making this finding, the Court finds the HOA's argument that the "former Board" misunderstood the Declarations is not believable. [I]t misrepresented to others that the project was ongoing; continued to collect dues partially based on this misrepresentation; and spent the money elsewhere. [Pam] Snow was asked, for instance, why Ken Hudson, a Board member, who had sheet rock damage due to roof leaks, had the repairs paid for by the HOA. She responded that it was because he requested that the HOA make payment. She acknowledged that the Declarations stated unit owners were responsible for damage repairs inside their own units. Based on the Boards ongoing violations of the Declarations for ten years; evidence of the HOAs apparent practice of improperly paying repair invoices for some unit owners through 2021; and [Pam] Snows discovery of years, and years, and years of apparent financial improprieties; the Court will not presume that these HOA dues were spent on other legitimate HOA expenses. The HOA argues that the current Board and unit owners should not be financially punished for the former Board's actions. This argument incorrectly assumes that the "present Board" is a distinct entity which is not responsible for the actions of the "former Board." The Court disagrees. The HOA Board is an ongoing entity established by the Declarations, which owes a continuing fiduciary duty to unit owners; regardless of changing makeup of the individuals serving on it over the years.
Mar 16th, 2024

Terrible service. does not advocate. does not look for quotes. slow to respond. would give negative stars if I could.
Mar 1st, 2024

With regard to all of the one star reviews that have been posted on Google and Yelp for years, Pam Snow has been heard to exclaim: "I can't do everything!" No, Pam. Apparently not. So, in the meantime we will wait, fight, wait, fight some more, all the while your poor assistants come and go through a revolving door.
Jan 18th, 2024